Reason

What’s on your mind?

This case will go to the Supreme Court very quickly.

The appellate court rightly concludes that Gordon-Darby's lawsuit had multiple legal problems.

It limits executive power grabs in this field, as well as others.

The administration is wrong to claim that the 60-day time limit in the Act is "stops" due to the ongoing ceasefire.

Legally, Trump must either cease operations or ask Congress for approval. He did neither, and Congress just went on recess.

Smart meters, bad metaphors, and the color of state law

Robby Soave and Christian Britschgi discuss how Sen. Rand Paul is ready to go after Anthony Fauci's pardon and how Mr. Beast blew up the internet, again.

So holds an Oregon appellate court.

Cole Tomas Allen's actions just don't make sense, even in his own words, or in a time of political polarization.

An excerpt from Delaware Superior Court Judge Sean Lugg's 42-page opinion yesterday in Newsom v. Fox News Network, LLC: In……

In a bid to “reaffirm its exclusive jurisdiction” over prediction markets such as Kalshi, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission is suing six states for interfering in federally regulated financial markets.

A new bill would compel Meta, Google, and TikTok to pay for Australian journalism.

Bootleggers, Baptists, and the fight over who gets to write America's self-driving car rules.

A notable roster of center-right thinkers engages with Justice Thomas' recent lecture.

The first step in recovery is recognizing that you have a problem.

Unionization efforts at Starbucks and Amazon get front-page media coverage. But dozens of workplaces discard their unions every year, often with little fanfare.

May Day should be a day to honor victims of an ideology that took tens of millions of lives. But we should also be open to alternative dates if they can attract broad enough support.

Eat the rich…then what?

This 20-years-later sequel traces a generation's economic fortunes through the decline of magazine journalism.

Plus: FISA reauthorization, driverless trucks in California, and an Epstein suicide note.

An interesting illustration of how American courts handle (correctly, I think) foreign marriages.

See Monday's jury verdict, which awards $75K in compensatory damages plus $125K in punitive damages for each of two statements,……

After California made this same mistake in 1999, it took 12 years to dig out of the hole. Taxpayers footed the bill.

The term “hate speech” gets thrown around a lot, but it’s legally protected in the U.S.

5/1/1871: Knox v. Lee decided.   The post Today in Supreme Court History: May 1, 1871 appeared first on Reason.com.

A gossip column runs up against monarchical censorship.

Contrary to the concerns of big-is-bad types, the game's charm has only grown since its Big Tech acquisition.

In Minnesota, Anthony Stephen Israelson was found guilty of two misdemeanors for driving a school bus drunk. The case stemmed… The post Brickbat: Who's Gonna Drive You Home? appeared first on Reason.com.

What’s on your mind?